Espace client

Connectez-vous à
votre espace personnel

Mot de passe oublié?

Votre marque est-elle déjà enregistrée?

Marque

Produits et services, ou classe(s)

Recherche avancée

 

Si vous n'êtes pas encore membre d'Eurimak,
merci de vous enregister.

Inscription gratuite!

Clients testimonials

Eurimark is helping us for fast trademark registration; we benefit from a 24/7 service to answer our clients' most urgent requests. We appreciate the number of countries covered by the system that allows us to centralize for a single project all the registrations with only one contact.

Nicolas van Beek,

VAYTON Brand Capital

Clients testimonials

Eurimark est le système le plus intelligent pour effectuer une recherche globale concernant la protection d'un nom de marque en Europe.

Il permet sur une même interface de vérifier la disponibilité d'une marque en devenir, d'un nom de domaine et d'accéder en toute transparence au coût pays par pays d'un dépôt efficace.

Il est à mes yeux et dans notre usage quotidien, bien mieux qu'une simple base de données, mais un service complet d'informations pour déposer certaines idées qui souvent se concentrent dans un nom.

Cyril Gaillard,

Bénéfik - L'identité de Marque

<<>>
 

Attention, ouverture dans une nouvelle fenêtre. PDFImprimerEnvoyer

USA: Modified watches as counterfeit products

There are no translations available.

UNITED STATES: Modified watches are counterfeit products

The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York decided on 27 September 2007 (05-civ.-6615, CARTIER vs. Aaron Faber) that modified CARTIER watches are counterfeit products.

The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York decided on 27 September 2007 (05-civ.-6615, CARTIER vs. Aaron Faber) that modified CARTIER watches are counterfeit products.

Faber fixes diamonds or other jewels on first-class watches, including “CARTIER”-watches. Faber then sells the watches or offers them for sale on consignment to auction houses. The original trademark remains on the modified watches, without indicating that the watches have been modified by Faber.

According to the Court, a product is counterfeit if it shows the original trademark that is likely to mislead the public as to its source of origin. The Court found that the public being confronted with the modified watches would believe that these watches and its jewels are attributable to CARTIER.

In the present case, some of the modified watches looked like more expensive CARTIER watches, others did not resemble to the CARTIER collection, but even in those case the Court found that Faber deceived the public when not disclosing the modifications.