Kundenbereich

Loggen Sie ein in Ihren Kundenbereich

Passwort vergessen?

Marke registriert?

Markenname

Waren und Dienstleistungen, oder Klasse(n)

Erweiterte Suche

 

Kein Mitglied von Eurimark,
bitte registrieren.

Registrierung

Clients testimonials

Eurimark is helping us for fast trademark registration; we benefit from a 24/7 service to answer our clients' most urgent requests. We appreciate the number of countries covered by the system that allows us to centralize for a single project all the registrations with only one contact.

Nicolas van Beek,

VAYTON Brand Capital

Clients testimonials

Eurimark est le système le plus intelligent pour effectuer une recherche globale concernant la protection d'un nom de marque en Europe.

Il permet sur une même interface de vérifier la disponibilité d'une marque en devenir, d'un nom de domaine et d'accéder en toute transparence au coût pays par pays d'un dépôt efficace.

Il est à mes yeux et dans notre usage quotidien, bien mieux qu'une simple base de données, mais un service complet d'informations pour déposer certaines idées qui souvent se concentrent dans un nom.

Cyril Gaillard,

Bénéfik - L'identité de Marque

<<>>
 

Achtung, öffnet in einem neuen Fenster. PDFDruckenE-Mail

Likelihood of confusion between two trademarks of weak distinctive caracter: MICRO FOCUS vs. FOCUS

There are no translations available.

The Court of First Instance ruled a decision on 16 May 2007 in the case T-491/04 (Merant GmbH vs. OHIM), concluding that there exists a likelihood of confusion between the conflicting trademarks MICRO FOCUS (with device) and FOCUS (word trademark).

The opponent is the owner of the earlier German trademark registration:

Image

 protected for goods and services in classes 09, 16, 41, 42, whereas the applicant filed a community trademark for the sign "FOCUS" in various classes, among others in classes 09, 16, 41 and 42, covering goods and services identical to the earlier "MICRO FOCUS" trademark registration.
According to the Court, the conflicting signs are conceptually and visually similar. The Court considers the word element "FOCUS" as being the dominant element of the earlier trademark, as the relevant public, i.e. the German consumers will perceive the English word "MICRO" as meaning "small" and might consequently be mislead by thinking that the earlier trademark is a variation of the younger trademark and vice-versa.
The differences between the signs, the supplemental word and phonetically element "MICRO" in the earlier trademark and the graphic element of the earlier trademark do not avoid any likelihood of confusion between the conflicting trademarks, as the existing similarities on visual and conceptual levels are quite high and as the concerned goods and services are identical or at least similar.